QR Code

Databricks Apps Adoption Playbook

Field vs Product framework for driving adoption

Databricks Apps Adoption Playbook

What is this?

A structured playbook for driving adoption of Databricks Apps, organized by Field Gaps vs Product Gaps.

Audience

Role What You’ll Find
GTM Leaders Strategic wins, attach rate metrics, pipeline health, exec readouts
GTM ICs (FE/SA) Sales plays, objection handling, guided selling triggers, enablement
Product Managers Field signal, loss analysis, feature adoption, friction summary
Adoption Architects Hypotheses, traceability, action plan, operating cadence, deliverables

How to Use This Playbook

1. The Mission

Drive deliberate, field-led adoption of Databricks Apps—not waiting for organic product-led growth, but building the GTM muscle, plays, and metrics to make Apps a strategic attach motion.

2. North Star Metrics

Phase Metric Customer Focus
3-6 months Strategic Wins Quality motion (Enterprise)
6-9 months Attach Rates Both
12+ months Coverage Quantity motion (Digital Native)

3. Key Hypotheses

ID Belief Decision Point
H1 Apps as Tip of the Spear Month 6
H2 Ecosystem Synergy Is the Moat Month 9
H3 Full-Funnel GTM Gap Month 3
H4 Three Archetypes Drive 80% Month 6
H5 SI Partnerships Counter Palantir Month 9
H6 Metrics Will Align BU Leaders Month 3
H7 Net-New Focus Is Right Month 6
H8 Quality vs Quantity Matters Month 6

4. Navigate by owner:

5. Execute from Action Plan week by week

6. Track validation in Traceability at decision points

7. Present with Presentation Structure for exec and peer reviews

8. Review Parking Lot for future work and integration items

Quick Navigation

1. Foundation

Chapter Description
Mission and Role Role definition, operating model
Product Context Product state, roadmap, sweet spot

2. Field Gaps

Chapter Owner Description
ICP and Targeting Field Ops Customer segmentation, lighthouse selection
Positioning and Messaging Marketing Honest positioning, competitive messaging
Sales Plays and Patterns Field Enablement Archetypes, objection handling
Field Enablement Enablement Training priorities, events, EBCs
Field Incentives Sales Ops Recognition, SPIFs, signal capture
Partner Ecosystem Partners FE, ISVs, SIs, Industry Leads, PS
Signal Capture Sales Ops Feedback loops, PM influence

3. Product Gaps

Chapter Owner Description
Use Case Tracking PM Archetype validation, pattern detection
Feature Adoption Roadmap PM DBUs, CSAT, adoption metrics
Friction Summary PM Product gaps, workarounds
Loss Analysis AA Deal losses, competitive intel

4. Strategic Framework

Chapter Description
Hypotheses and Beliefs 8 testable hypotheses with data needs
Traceability Matrix Hypothesis → Action → Validation chain

5. Execution

Chapter Description
Action Plan 3-6-12 month roadmap with deliverables
Operating Cadence Meetings, rhythms, communication

6. Presentation

Chapter Description
Presentation Structure 45-min panel deck with speaker notes and Q&A backup

7. Parking Lot

Future work and integration items awaiting prioritization.

Item Description
Deliverables Gap Analysis Missing deliverables mapped to field/product gaps and phases
Metrics Framework Consolidated metrics, data sources, and dashboard specs
Anticipated Objections Interview prep with sample answers and gap analysis

Wiki Structure

flowchart TB
    subgraph Foundation["1. FOUNDATION"]
        F1[Mission & Role]
        F2[Product Context]
    end
    
    subgraph Field["2. FIELD GAPS - Who: Field Ops, Enablement"]
        FG1[ICP & Targeting]
        FG2[Positioning]
        FG3[Sales Plays]
        FG4[Enablement]
        FG5[Incentives]
        FG6[Partners]
        FG7[Signal Capture]
    end
    
    subgraph Product["3. PRODUCT GAPS - Who: PM, Engineering"]
        PG1[Use Case Tracking]
        PG2[Feature Roadmap]
        PG3[Friction Summary]
        PG4[Loss Analysis]
    end
    
    subgraph Framework["4. STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK"]
        SF1[Hypotheses]
        SF2[Traceability]
    end
    
    subgraph Execution["5. EXECUTION"]
        E1[Action Plan]
        E2[Operating Cadence]
    end
    
    subgraph Presentation["6. PRESENTATION"]
        P1[Slide Deck Structure]
    end
    
    subgraph ParkingLot["7. PARKING LOT"]
        PL1[Deliverables Gap]
        PL2[Metrics Framework]
    end
    
    Foundation --> Field
    Foundation --> Product
    Field --> Framework
    Product --> Framework
    Framework --> Execution
    Execution --> Presentation
    Execution -.-> ParkingLot

About Me

Author

Tushar Madan
Aspiring Adoption Architect, Databricks

Career Journey

Prior to Databricks: Big Data roles at Ameriprise, FINRA, Optum, Walgreens, and Atos

At Databricks (2019–Present):

Period Role
2019–2021 Solutions Architect, NY
2021–2022 FE Leader, NY Core Team
2022–2024 FE Leader, Retail North East
2024–Present RCT Hunting Lead — National team with 3 sub-BUs, 16 SAs, 1 FLM

Why I’m a Good Fit for This Role

1. Recovering Data Scientist 🔬
Building hypotheses, finding data, and validating them comes naturally to me.
→ Milestone Analysis across RCT Products

2. Processes Become Institutions 🏛️
Created the Practice Lead motion within RCT—processes that outlast people.
→ Practice Lead Org Design

3. Passionate About Apps as GTM Centerpiece 🚀

4. Love Working with Product & Diving Deep 🔧
Roll up sleeves when needed.
→ NPD DBSQL Deep Dive (worked with Shant)

If you’re wondering what avianna.ai is…

It’s my daughter’s first name: Avianna Ishari Madan (AI Madan) 💛

Version

Last Updated: January 2026