Hypothesis Traceability Matrix
This document maps each hypothesis to its validation path: what documents inform it, what actions test it, and what metrics prove or disprove it.
Traceability Framework
flowchart LR
subgraph Chain["TRACEABILITY CHAIN"]
H["HYPOTHESIS<br/>Your belief"]
I["INFORMED BY<br/>Documents that shape it"]
T["TESTED BY<br/>Actions that test it"]
V["VALIDATED BY<br/>Metrics that prove/disprove"]
end
H --> I --> T --> V
V --> |"If Validated"| Scale["Scale the action"]
V --> |"If Invalidated"| Pivot["Pivot strategy"]
Validation Timeline
timeline
title Hypothesis Validation Checkpoints
section Month 3
H3 FE Enablement : FE confidence survey improvement
: Apps conversations increase
H6 Metrics Align : BU leaders accept metrics
: First exec briefing delivered
section Month 6
H1 Tip of Spear : Attach rate baseline + improvement
: 3-5 strategic wins documented
H4 Archetypes : Revenue by archetype tracked
: 3 playbooks validated
H7 Net-New Focus: Win rate net-new vs migration
H8 Quality vs Quantity: Motion-matched retention
section Month 9
H2 Ecosystem Moat : Win rate vs hyperscalers
: Governance differentiator cited
H5 SI vs FDE : 2+ SI-delivered apps
: Time-to-value comparison
Master Traceability Table
| ID |
Hypothesis |
Informed By |
Tested By |
Validated By |
Decision Point |
| H1 |
Apps as Tip of the Spear |
Sales Plays, ICP |
Strategic wins, Attach tracking |
Attach rate, Influenced ACV |
Month 6 |
| H2 |
Ecosystem Moat |
Positioning, Sales Plays |
Competitive wins, Messaging |
Win rate vs hyperscalers |
Month 9 |
| H3 |
Full-Funnel GTM Gap |
Field Enablement |
Enablement sprint |
FE confidence, Apps conversations |
Month 3 |
| H4 |
Three Archetypes |
Sales Plays, ICP |
Playbook pilots |
Revenue by archetype |
Month 6 |
| H5 |
SI vs FDE |
Partners |
SI pilot |
SI-delivered Apps, TTV |
Month 9 |
| H6 |
Metrics Align BUs |
ICP, Incentives |
BU alignment |
BU investment in Apps GTM |
Month 3 |
| H7 |
Net-New Focus |
Product Context, Positioning |
Opportunity qualification |
Win rate net-new vs migration |
Month 6 |
| H8 |
Quality vs Quantity |
ICP, Partners |
Motion pilots |
Retention by motion |
Month 6 |
Detailed Traceability by Hypothesis
H1: Apps as Tip of the Spear
| Phase |
Action |
Timeline |
Owner |
Output |
| P1 |
Document strategic wins with attach narrative |
M1-M3 |
Adoption Architect |
3-5 win stories |
| P2 |
Implement attach rate tracking |
M4 |
Analytics + AA |
Dashboard live |
| P2 |
Establish attach rate baseline |
M6 |
Analytics |
Baseline number |
| P3 |
Measure attach rate improvement |
M9-M12 |
Analytics |
Trend data |
| Metric |
Source |
Target |
Current |
| Attach rate (% expand to other SKUs) |
SFDC + telemetry |
TBD |
Not measured |
| Time-to-expansion (days) |
Telemetry |
TBD |
Not measured |
| Influenced ACV |
Finance |
TBD |
Not measured |
H2: Ecosystem Synergy Is the Moat
| Phase |
Action |
Timeline |
Owner |
Output |
| P1 |
Capture competitive win stories |
M1-M3 |
Adoption Architect |
Win narratives |
| P2 |
Multi-product correlation analysis |
M4-M6 |
Analytics |
Correlation data |
| P2 |
Win/loss analysis with moat attribution |
M4-M6 |
Adoption Architect |
Loss patterns |
| Metric |
Source |
Target |
Current |
| Competitive win rate vs hyperscalers |
SFDC |
TBD |
Not measured |
| Multi-product usage correlation |
Telemetry |
TBD |
Not measured |
| Customer moat quotes |
Interviews |
5+ quotes |
0 |
H3: Full-Funnel GTM Gap
| Phase |
Action |
Timeline |
Owner |
Output |
| P1 |
FE confidence survey (baseline) |
M1 W2 |
Adoption Architect |
Baseline score |
| P1 |
Security patterns training |
M2 |
Enablement + AA |
Training delivered |
| P1 |
App discovery workshop |
M2-M3 |
Enablement + AA |
Workshop piloted |
| P1 |
FE confidence survey (post) |
M3 W4 |
Adoption Architect |
Post score |
| Metric |
Source |
Target |
Current |
| FE confidence score |
Survey |
+20% improvement |
Not measured |
| Apps conversations per FE |
Activity tracking |
TBD |
Not measured |
| Win rate: Enabled vs non-enabled |
SFDC |
Enabled > non-enabled |
Not measured |
H4: Three App Archetypes Drive 80%
| Phase |
Action |
Timeline |
Owner |
Output |
| P1 |
Classify top 20 customers by archetype |
M1 W2 |
Adoption Architect |
Classification |
| P2 |
Business Cockpit playbook |
M5 |
Adoption Architect |
Playbook v1 |
| P2 |
Deep Vertical playbook |
M5 |
Adoption Architect |
Playbook v1 |
| P2 |
Playbook pilot with 2 FE teams |
M5 W3 |
AA + FE |
Pilot feedback |
| Metric |
Source |
Target |
Current |
| % of wins by archetype |
SFDC analysis |
80% in 3 archetypes |
Not measured |
| Win rate by archetype |
SFDC |
TBD |
Not measured |
| Playbook adoption rate |
Field feedback |
70% usage |
Not measured |
H5: SI Partnerships Can Counter Palantir’s FDE Motion
| Phase |
Action |
Timeline |
Owner |
Output |
| P2 |
SI partnership assessment |
M6 |
AA + Partners |
Partner shortlist |
| P3 |
SI enablement program design |
M8 |
AA + Partners |
Enablement plan |
| P3 |
SI pilot launch (1-2 partners) |
M9 |
Partners + AA |
Pilot live |
| P3 |
SI pilot retrospective |
M11 |
Partners + AA |
Results analysis |
| Metric |
Source |
Target |
Current |
| SI time-to-value vs internal |
Project tracking |
SI ≤ internal |
Not measured |
| SI-sourced pipeline |
SFDC |
TBD |
Not measured |
| SI customer satisfaction |
CSAT |
≥ internal |
Not measured |
H6: Influenced Revenue Metrics Will Align BU Leaders
| Phase |
Action |
Timeline |
Owner |
Output |
| P1 |
BU leader interviews on metrics |
M1-M2 |
Adoption Architect |
Feedback |
| P1 |
Attach rate definition proposal |
M2 W4 |
Adoption Architect |
Proposal doc |
| P2 |
Finance alignment on methodology |
M4-M5 |
AA + Finance |
Approved method |
| P2 |
Attach rate dashboard |
M4-M6 |
Analytics + AA |
Dashboard live |
| Metric |
Source |
Target |
Current |
| BU leader acceptance |
Stakeholder feedback |
3+ SVP/VPs |
0 |
| Finance approval |
Finance team |
Approved |
Not submitted |
| Comp discussion |
FE leadership |
On agenda |
Not started |
H7: Net-New Apps (Not Migration) Is the Right Focus
| Phase |
Action |
Timeline |
Owner |
Output |
| P1 |
Tag opportunities as net-new vs migration |
M1 |
Sales Ops + AA |
SFDC field |
| P2 |
Win/loss analysis by opportunity type |
M4-M6 |
Adoption Architect |
Analysis |
| P2 |
Customer satisfaction by type |
M5-M6 |
CS + AA |
CSAT data |
| Metric |
Source |
Target |
Current |
| Win rate: Net-new vs migration |
SFDC |
Net-new > migration |
Not measured |
| CSAT: Net-new vs migration |
CSAT data |
Net-new > migration |
Not measured |
| Pipeline: % net-new |
SFDC |
>70% net-new |
Not measured |
H8: Quality vs Quantity Determines Success
| Phase |
Action |
Timeline |
Owner |
Output |
| P1 |
Align with PS on Apps capacity |
M1 |
AA + PS |
Engagement model |
| P1 |
Get baseline retention by segment |
M1 |
AA + Analytics |
Baseline data |
| P2 |
Pilot Quality motion with lighthouse |
M2-M3 |
AA + PS |
Pilot results |
| P2 |
Pilot Quantity motion with DN |
M5 |
AA + ISV |
Pilot results |
| Metric |
Source |
Target |
Current |
| Retention by segment |
Product telemetry |
Quality > Quantity for Enterprise |
Not measured |
| PS engagement correlation |
PS + Product |
Positive correlation |
Not measured |
| IDE usage correlation (DN) |
Product + ISV |
Positive correlation |
Not measured |
Hypothesis Decision Timeline
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ DECISION TIMELINE │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │
│ MONTH 1-2 MONTH 3 MONTH 6 MONTH 9 │
│ ───────── ─────── ─────── ─────── │
│ │
│ Baseline data H3 Decision: H1, H6, H7 H5 Decision│
│ collection Enablement H8 Decisions: SI Pilot │
│ working? Metrics, working? │
│ H3: FE survey Attach, │
│ H4: Classification H6 Decision: Net-new, H2 Decision│
│ H6: BU interviews BU buy-in? Motions Moat real? │
│ │
│ H4 Decision: │
│ Archetypes │
│ hold? │
│ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Validation Status Dashboard
| Hypothesis |
Data Status |
Test Status |
Decision Due |
Decision |
| H1: Tip of Spear |
⬜ No baseline |
⬜ Not started |
Month 6 |
Pending |
| H2: Ecosystem Moat |
⬜ No baseline |
⬜ Not started |
Month 9 |
Pending |
| H3: Full-Funnel GTM |
⬜ No baseline |
⬜ Not started |
Month 3 |
Pending |
| H4: Three Archetypes |
⬜ No baseline |
⬜ Not started |
Month 6 |
Pending |
| H5: SI vs FDE |
⬜ No baseline |
⬜ Not started |
Month 9 |
Pending |
| H6: Metrics Align BUs |
⬜ No baseline |
⬜ Not started |
Month 3 |
Pending |
| H7: Net-New Focus |
⬜ No baseline |
⬜ Not started |
Month 6 |
Pending |
| H8: Quality vs Quantity |
⬜ No baseline |
⬜ Not started |
Month 6 |
Pending |
Update this table as validation progresses.
If Hypothesis Is Invalidated
| Hypothesis |
Pivot If Wrong |
| H1: Tip of Spear |
Reposition Apps as standalone value prop, not platform play |
| H2: Ecosystem Moat |
Compete on specific features, not integration |
| H3: Full-Funnel GTM |
Focus on product improvements, not training |
| H4: Three Archetypes |
Develop more granular or different segmentation |
| H5: SI vs FDE |
Consider internal FDE build for strategic accounts |
| H6: Metrics Align BUs |
Find alternative alignment mechanism (exec mandate, etc.) |
| H7: Net-New Focus |
Accelerate migration capability investment |
| H8: Quality vs Quantity |
Investigate other retention drivers |
Last Updated: January 2026